
University of Utah Success Story
Video Interview Practice Builds Career Readiness at the University of Utah
See how CollegeNET helps institutions turn challenges into measurable successes.
Video Interview Practice Builds Career Readiness at the University of Utah
By the time Portland State University (PSU) decided to update its event scheduling system, the campus had been using EMS software for decades. Over the years, complaints among staff and student schedulers had grown.
According to Brown, the University has already seen “amazing results” from their switch to 25Live.
Michelle Bright, a functional administrator at Indiana University, praises Series25 for its intuitive interface, bulk-editing capabilities, and seamless technical and implementation support.
Megan Peterson highlights the university's long-time satisfaction with Series25, crediting the exceptional, personalized customer support they’ve received.
Monica Keyes from North Carolina A&T State University explains how Series25 fostered a seamless and more equitable scheduling process.
Carleton College's Noel Ponder details the overwhelmingly positive feedback from students, staff, and other users across campus following their successful transition to Series25.
Washington State University's Sheree Collins praises Series25’s unparalleled reliability, ease of use, and integral features like express scheduling and robust reporting.
Alexis Garcia from the Rhode Island School of Design shares how CollegeNET consistently incorporates customer feedback to make product enhancements that meet their needs.
The University of Minnesota's Liz Johnson discusses how Series25 helped overcome internal resistance by providing a robust solution for academic and event schedulin
Visibility | Limited reporting, inaccurate data – schedules become riddled with errors and take much longer to correct when schedulers don’t have accurate and current information |
Communication | No automated notifications of changes – poor preparation and errors occur when all involved campus departments aren’t notified of changes |
Support | With legacy scheduling systems, slow and/or poor responses to customers’ help requests are the norm |
Inefficiency | Lack of integration and automation and inferior leads to scheduling problems and manual workarounds everywhere |
Flexibility | The old one-size-fits-all model of legacy scheduling software allows no flexibility for institutions to configure the system to meet their needs |
Staff Burden | When room requesters can’t input all required information or can’t see available resources, time is lost to fielding emails and trouble shooting |
Unhappy Users | When the system is difficult to access (e.g., requires individua login) or is too complicated to use, complaints multiply |
Don’t see the information you’re looking for?
Please let us know what you need.